Saturday, 3 March 2012

Using smartphones behind the wheel is more dangerous than drink driving !

Using smartphones for social networking while driving is more dangerous than drink driving or being high on cannabis behind the wheel according to research published today by the IAM (Institute of Advanced Motorists). Despite this, eight per cent of drivers admit to using smartphones for email and social networking while driving – equivalent to 3.5 million licence holders2.
Twenty-four per cent of 17-24 year old drivers – a group already at higher risk of being in a crash – admit to using smartphones for email and social networking while driving3.
For their research, the IAM and TRL (Transport Research Laboratory) used DigiCar – TRL's car driving simulator – to examine the effects of young drivers using smartphones to access facebook. In every test of driving performance, young people who were using facebook while driving were badly affected.4
When sending and receiving facebook messages:
  • reaction times slowed by around 38% and participants often missed key events;
  • participants were unable to maintain a central lane position resulting in an increased number of unintentional lane departures; and
  • were unable to respond as quickly to the car in front  gradually changing speed.
When comparing these new results to previous studies the level of impairment on driving is greater than the effects of drinking, cannabis and texting.
  • Using a smartphone for social networking slows reaction times by 37.6 per cent;
  • texting slows reaction times by 37.4 per cent;
  • hands-free mobile phone conversation slows reaction times by 26.5 per cent;
  • cannabis slows reaction times by 21 per cent;
  • alcohol (above UK driving limit but below 100mg per 100ml of blood) slows reaction time by between six and 15 per cent; and
  • alcohol at the legal limit slows reaction times by 12.5 per cent.
The IAM is calling for government action to highlight the dangers of using smartphones behind the wheel. Phone manufacturers and social network providers also have a key role to play in spreading the message. Attitudes to seatbelts and drink driving have changed dramatically over the last thirty years, and, with the right information, halting smartphone use could become a similar success story.
IAM chief executive Simon Best said: "This research shows how incredibly dangerous using smartphones while driving is, yet unbelievably it is a relatively common practice. If you're taking your hand off the wheel to use the phone, reading the phone display and thinking about your messages, then you're simply not concentrating on driving. It's antisocial networking and it's more dangerous than drink driving and it must become just as socially unacceptable.
"Young people have grown up with smartphones and using them is part of everyday life. But more work needs to be done by the government and social network providers to show young people that they are risking their lives and the lives of others if they use their smartphones while driving."
TRL senior researcher Nick Reed said: "Our research clearly demonstrates that driver behaviour was significantly and dramatically impaired when a smartphone was being used for social networking. Drivers spent more time looking at their phone than the road ahead when trying to send messages, rendering the driver blind to emerging hazards and the developing traffic situation.
"Even when hazards were detected, the driver's ability to respond was slowed. The combination of observed impairments to driving will cause a substantial increase in the risk of a collision that may affect not only the driver but also their passengers and other road users. Smartphones are incredibly useful and convenient tools when used appropriately and responsibly. Their use for social networking when driving is neither." 
The report summary and full report are now available

1 comment:

  1. This is sad news, yet one that doesn't come as a surprise. Everytime (without fail)I travel around the southern side of the M25 I would see someone texting - or are they tweeting?

    I do own a smart phone, and I'm very pleased with it. Keeping me in touch with friends, family, work and hobbies. But to do so, Apple, Google and Microsoft deemed it fit for our phones to ping, whistle, call, shout, sing and generally gain out attention as soon as something in the world happens. I for one have spent some time switching these automatic distractions off, something that all drivers should do.

    Then we need to leave our toys alone. Again, my phone plugs into my car - something that many people are doing. Just think, a device that can play music, answer calls on a hands free basis (controversial), guide us with Sat Nav software, flag up speed cameras and tell us what the traffic conditions are like ahead. Sounds great and all very useful in their own right, but how much do we want in the car? And how much is too much? I for one find each piece of software useful, but I would like to think that I know when to operate my phone, sat nav, MP3 and AA traffic news and when not. But for many, it's too tempting to take their eyes off the road to see who's now following them on Facebook.

    Leave that "" to when you arrive at your destination - or you may never reach your destination at all. Simple, but a very hard message to send - not while driving anyhow!

    Graham Aylard - Observer MKGAM